The vast consumption of environmental
resources and never learning from our mistakes is my biggest concern. We as humans are so self-centered and have an
extreme tunnel vision of life and where we want to be that we usually do not
care about how we get there and what is damaged or irreversibly destroyed in
the process. Before the overwhelming
need for petroleum we had an overwhelming need for timber and coal, which is
still prevalent but overshadowed by the need of oil. There was vast deforestation and unsafe coal
mines. We made the land uninhabitable because
of the coal mines and we destroyed many ecosystems that will take a very long
time if not ever to recover. Greed and
impatience got in the way of our better judgment. We want it now and we want it cheap. We notice
the impact on the environment and always choose to ignore it, we see that now
with our need of petroleum and the impact it has caused. We have damaged the ocean and lakes, made
more land uninhabitable again, but we really don’t care. Instead of looking for other resources that
are renewable and safe for use to create energy or materials for products. We just keep going because its familiar and
it would cost too much to research otherwise.
We are running low on oil and we know that, just look at gas prices
today. So instead of investing into
other materials we invent fracking and absolutely destroy more land. This vicious
cycle needs to stop, this world cannot take it much longer. If we want to
continue to live and prosper on this planet, we need to start taking care of it
or it will surely destroy us as we did it.
The Odyssey of the Mind
Friday, May 9, 2014
Thursday, April 10, 2014
Occupy Oakland
Before this blog was assigned, I was
not well informed about the events that transpired in Oakland concerning the
occupy movement. After doing some
research, reading articles, watching videos taken by protestors, viewing news
reals, and seeing how the movement was about the inequities of the distribution
of wealth in America, I am better able to make an informed opinion. The premise for the movement was sound. I am in complete agreement as to why this
protest was set into movement. It is
unfair that the majority of Americans face such inequalities. The rich keep getting richer and the poor
keep getting poorer. Light needs to be
shed on the atrocities of our government’s action on the bank bailout. I am stunned by the fact that minimum
punishment was doled out on the individuals who were stealing thousands if not
millions of dollars. If one of the 99%
gets caught for stealing a loaf of bread to feed their family they are harshly
punished and now have a black stain upon their background. However, if those CEO’s/businessmen steal
thousands of dollars, their actions are not only ignored, they are given more
money by our own government and stockholders.
I feel the occupy Wall Street movement in New York City did a good job of
bringing attention to this situation in America.
While this occupy movement was
sending a good message, it was poorly orchestrated. There was no leadership, no counsel, and
really no direction. The protestors had
a message and wanted it heard. If they
had a structure their message would have been heard louder instead of being
heard as a cacophony of hypocrisy, violence, and unguided direction. This was not the same for the occupy Wall
Street protests. The Wall Street occupy
did a much better job than Oakland for getting the message across. In my opinion, the occupy Oakland movement
was a mess on all fronts. The protestors
did not adhere to the message. They called
the square they occupied after Oscar Grant.
This brought in a racial undertone.
Other groups joined the movement just to incite violence and looting. They had their own personal agenda apart from
Occupy. On the other hand Mayor Jean
Quan made this an even bigger mess with her indecisiveness and inability to
act. She started out with a clear and
strong message to stop the protests. She
cleared the square and put a halt to the protests, but later succumbed to political
pressure and changed her “hard lined” approach.
As a response they re-occupied the Ogawa Plaza which caused even more
problems. Even though the movement calls
for a recognition of the inequalities of salaries for the 99%, the movement shutdown
the Port of Oakland causing exactly those 99% they were fighting for to lose
out on more money because of missed pay due to the protests. Between the Mayor and the protestors, this was
the “perfect storm” of how not to try to get your message recognized.
This protest had a lot of unnecessary
violence. Was the violence
justified? To some degree I agree that
is was. There are countless videos on YouTube
showing the protestors literally throwing the first stone. The violence shown by the police force was
way too aggressive and should not have been taken to that degree. These protestors were civil, peaceful and
just wanted their voices to be heard. I
believe the Mayor over reacted and caused a lot of the problems associated with
the violence. It is unfortunate that
this got so out of control in Oakland. The
overall message for the occupy movement was positive, but the message seemed to
have become lost in Oakland.
Thursday, March 20, 2014
Argument 2
Argument:
How can the wealthy live in such opulence while the new poor live in
such poverty in this day and age?
“We have the
resources, experience, and knowledge to virtually eliminate poverty, especially
long-term poverty, but we do not yet have the political will.”(Rich and the
Rest of Us pg.46) For decades political
leaders have made attempts at resolving the poverty crisis, but have not been
successful at achieving their goal. They
were not successful at standing up to the wealthy of this country.
President Franklin
D, Roosevelt instituted his “New Deal” program of relief, recovery, and
reform. His plan transformed the
financial system in the United States for more than forty years. Harry S. Truman during his two terms in
office continued with Roosevelt’s New Deal Program. However, his primary focus consisted of
closely monitoring two wars which consumed his entire tenure in office. General Dwight D. Eisenhower was an opponent
of the New Deal coalition which was an alliance that wanted to implement less
government agendas. Therefore, even
though Eisenhower was considered a conservative he favored the New Deal
legislation. President John F. Kennedy
took office in 1960, by this time many foreign issues took precedence and the
New Deal Coalition began to deteriorate.
President Kennedy’s focus was on other worldly affairs, primarily trying
to prevent a nuclear holocaust. Lynden B
Johnson’s goal was to reestablish the liberal coalition. During his first term Johnson declared a “War
on Poverty”. He instituted many programs
including food stamps, Head Start, work study, Job Corps, Medicaid, and
Medicare. His “Great Society” was
premised on the idea that the government should enlist these programs to reduce
poverty. Lyndon Johnson also signed the Civil
rights act of 1964 attempting to elevate Blacks out of poverty and providing
equality with the wealthy white population.
Corporate America
represents the greed in this country.
“Convenient or not, it’s a bitter irony when multi-billion-dollar banking
and investment companies make millions more off the poor millions who are
making less” (Rich and the Rest of Us pg 189).
Morgan Stanley produces and manages the food stamp cards (EBT). The more poor people in the country with EBT
cards the richer Morgan Stanley gets.
With each new card issued to a poor person only increases the profit
margins of this big Wall Street Firm. “…
your chief financial officers shipped $206 billion in cash to overseas tax
shelters last year, Bloomberg reported on Wednesday. The total amount of cash
held in offshore havens rose to $1.95 trillion, according to Bloomberg, which
is more than the combined market values of the six biggest companies in the U.S. To add insult to injury, or maybe injury to
injury, corporate CFOs are also staunchly opposed to raising the minimum wage,
according to a new survey by Duke University and CFO Magazine (Huffington Post,
3/12/2014). It seems it is okay for the
rich fat cats on Wall Street to make money, but they do not want to share it
with the rest of the population.
Corporate America is not only keep the poor from making money they are
also sheltering money in off-shore accounts from taxes in the US that could go
to support programs in this country that would benefit the poor.
“…as more and more
Americans are figuring out how to feed families on $150 a month, the mega-rich
have gone back to spending on luxury items… the market is zinging again with
purchases like… $80K battery-powered bicycles; $525,000 time prices; $1 million yachts; and vacation
homes in posh locals…” (The Rich and the Rest of Us pg 190). In my opinion, there should not be such a
disparity between the people living in Beverly Hills, Westwood and West
Hollywood compared to the people living in South Central LA. The homes in these wealthy areas are
obscenely opulent. The living conditions
in South Central are deplorable and something you would see in one of the
poorest Third World Nation. This is
America. It is the richest country in
the world. As a society, we should be
ashamed that this condition exists right in front of us. This is our fault and we should not allow our
elected officials to be happy with this condition.
Argument One
Argument:
How can colleges like Harvard, Stanford, and Princeton charge such
exorbitant tuition which basically shuts out the poor from attending and
relegating the poor to the state schools?
The rich ensure the success of their children by giving them entry to
the finest institutions of higher learning in the country and ensuring success
in their life.
The poor are
disadvantaged from the very start beginning early in life. The level of education students received in
the lower income schools have many problems.
They do not have the best teachers, facilities are lacking, supplies are
lacking, text books are inferior and the schools in many instances are not
located in the best areas. As noted in
the book “Savage Inequalities” which shined
the light on the East St. Louis schools, they had a high school next to a
Monsanto Plant inflicting dangerous health concerns on the students. Contrast this to wealthy neighborhoods, the
students have the best of everything and have advantages the poor neighborhoods
are lacking. “Black children who grow up
in neighborhoods with high levels of poverty and unemployment have a 76
percentage of graduating from high school compared to a 96 percent chance for black
students living in affluent neighborhoods” (Huffington Post, 12/4/11). So, not only do poor students get the shaft
on their education many don’t even get the chance to apply to colleges because
they do not graduate from high school.
The affluent areas virtually guarantee they will go to college
guaranteeing a successful future. The
wealthy make sure their own children are successful and stack the deck against
poor and underprivileged. The poor have a very difficult and tough road
to hoe. For the poor it is like they are
pushing a rock up a hill with the wealthy standing on it while they are pushing
it. I like in the Rich and the Rest Of Us it says “Are Americans just mouthing a
cliché when they say “the children are our future”. Or perhaps Americans aren’t talking about all
of our children. Maybe, in America,
we’ve resigned ourselves to the fact that only those who live in the right zip
codes deserve a quality education” (The Rich and the Rest of Us pg 119).
The wealthy
students have a lot of choices available to them. Schools like Harvard, Princeton, and Stanford
have very strict academic requirements/standards and the tuition at a private
school like one of these is cost prohibitive to any of the poor. If the students in the poor communities do
graduate they are even more disadvantaged.
These students need a 4.0 plus to get into these schools. The environment in the less affluent
Secondary Schools they come from does not foster them getting a 4.0 plus. There are a lot of distractions and
adversities they have to overcome. They
don’t have the same support system as the wealthy students. If a poor student is able to achieve and meet
the academic standards, they have to overcome the cost factor. These schools are EXPENSIVE. Harvard is very proud to advertise they
provide “financial assistance” to low income students. They advertise how they help the poor and
disadvantage, but the reality is “Families with students on scholarship pay an
average of $11,500 annually toward to the cost of a Harvard education” (Harvard
Gazette 2011). This figure does not
include room, board, transportation, books and other living expenses. This means a college education (tuition
alone) will cost over $45, 000. How many
poor people can afford this amount? The
poor are relegated to the state schools leaving the Ivy League to the wealthy. “I
would say the surprising, shocking, disgusting thing is that not only do we not
help people who are having trouble or are sliding down, we kick them a little
further. The whole system is rigged so
that if you start to spiral down, you’re going to spiral faster. There’s no ladder going up. There’s a greased chute going down” (The Rich
and the Rest of Us pg 75).
I feel this is
deplorable in the richest country in the world and is a big black mark on our
society. This is something you do not
see in the press and a fact that is not heavily advertised. It really disturbs me to see how Harvard like
to boast how they are helping the poor, but in fact when the average student on
a scholarship is paying over $46, 000 for a four year degree (without room and
board) is hypocrisy at its’ finest and certainly nothing to be boasting.
Thursday, March 13, 2014
Distribution of Wealth
The
video “9 Out Of 10 Americans Are Completely Wrong About This Mind-Blowing Fact”
I found to be shocking and enlightening.
I had no clue that the distribution of wealth in this country was that
unjust. That the poverty line is that
high or that the middle class resembles more of the lower class when compared
to the rich or the top 1%.
It
is unfair that those who work two to three jobs of grueling work are getting
paid significantly less than a CEO or an actor or writer. The movie stated that it would take the
“average” worker more than a month to earn what a CEO makes in one hour. A movie star makes millions for a few months
of work when an average worker makes only several thousands of dollars for a
few months. Take a look at the men and
women fighting in the military for our rights and freedoms. They sacrifice their freedoms for ours. They are shipped out into un-ideal living
conditions, obtain very little sleep and our in a constant worry for their
lives and the lives of their friends.
When they wake in the morning they do not know if they are going to
comeback in one piece, yet they continue on.
The average monthly salary estimated for 2014 of an enlisted soldier
that has served for less than two years is $2052.5. Surprisingly there is a 1.8% increase than
the previous year. This is just not
right. I’m not saying that these CEOs
and actors or anyone in those classes don’t work hard or didn’t work hard to
get to where they are now, but they are not working as many hours and are not
putting as much labor into their work or risking their lives. It is actually really ironic I think. All the other classes are actually paying
these CEOs and actors or anyone in the top 20% or top 1% salary. If it wasn’t for supply and demand (which the
company’s make damn sure there is enough of) or a want to go see a movie, they
would not be paid. I find CEOs, lawyers,
actors, investors, are actually all exploiters. They are all exploiting the
needs and wants of people. So no, I am
not completely content with the way our country is structured with the distribution
of its wealth. The wealthy in this
country just continue to get even wealthier while the poor just continue to
stay poor.
Almost
all of us are completely guilty of jading ourselves to the harsh reality of our
country. We are jading ourselves because
it is not made to be well known the way wealth is distributed in this
country. This is not a topic that is
discussed or well-advertised. Clearly,
when 9 out of 10 people did not know the reality of the wealth distribution,
there is something wrong. This is not a
common knowledge and people need to be educated on this topic. This is the best kept secret.
There
a lot more opportunities available for the rich than there are to the
poor. Higher education is more available
to the rich due to a socio-economic status.
They are able to afford schooling and given the quality of education
they received in the primary and secondary schools, equips them much better for
college. The poor are at a disadvantage
compared to college acceptance and affordability. This inequity shows itself in availability of
jobs. The poor need to work two jobs to
afford their bills and college. This
takes a lot of time away from focusing on school which in turn makes it harder
and a longer process to graduate. This
illustrates why the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.
In conclusion I was very dismayed to learn about the
wealth distribution from this YouTube video.
I was also very surprised to see how many people didn’t realize it as
well. I’m glad to see that I’m not the
only one that did not understand this fact.
What is even more troubling is that I don’t see anyone trying to fix it.
"2014 Military Pay Scale - Effective January 1st, 2014." 2014 Military Pay Scale. N.p.,
n.d. Web. 13 Mar. 2014.
<http://www.militaryfactory.com/military_pay_scale.asp>.
Friday, February 28, 2014
First Essay: The Goliaths of Education
Sean
Carbrey
Professor
Monique Williams
English
1A
28
February 2014
The Goliaths of Education
The
chasm between the have and have nots in education is huge. We need a radical
reform in our education system. The overall goal being to make it equitable. We
live in the wealthiest country in the world from an overall standpoint. We
spend an exorbitant amount of money to provide aid to countries all over the
world. What about our country? The way in which the poor are treated in America
is deplorable. The children of this country should come first. Not that I don’t
agree that we should be helping other countries, but we need to help ours
first. Assessments need to be implemented, and plans need to be carried out to
correct this problem. Our country’s leaders need to face the challenges, flaws,
and inequalities that exist in our educational system because this system is
failing.
It
is evident that many flaws exist within our educational system that negatively
impact student learning. In my opinion the primary issues are the inequities of:
educational facilities, teacher tenure, improper allocation of funds, lack of a
“good teacher”, high class size, and lack of needed materials in the poor
school districts vs. the wealthy school districts. “Average expenditures per
pupil in the city of New York in 1987 were approximately $5,500. In the highest
spending suburbs of New York City…funding levels rose above $11,000, with the
highest districts in the state at $15,000. “Why…,” asks the city’s Board of
Education, “should our students receive less” than do “similar students” who
live elsewhere? “The inequity is clear.”
Teacher
tenure is a road block to success in the schools. Teacher tenure is certainly
contributing to the problem. I feel that teacher tenure should be eliminated
and that teachers should have to work and be held to a disciplinary standard like
other working individuals. Teachers need
to feel the fear of being unemployed which, in most cases, will have an impact
on their work ethic thus complacency would be replaced with motivation. The
elimination of teacher tenure would insure the expulsion of ineffective teachers
who have become “burnt out” or those teachers who are just not cut-out for
teaching. There was an attempt made to eliminate teacher tenure in the
Washington D.C schools by the superintendent. That superintendent, Michelle
Rhee was brilliant. She recognized the problem and set forth with a passion to
fix it but was shut down by the lazy, and fearful individuals heading up the
teachers union. “There is a complete and utter lack of accountability for the
job that we’re supposed to be doing, which is impacting our kids.” Please
understand that job security is important, however, there needs to be
guidelines for teacher performance. The measurements for teacher performance
are not cut and dry.
We
need to make sure we have only excellent teachers in our school system. There
are too many ineffective or unmotivated teachers. “We have teachers…who only
bother to come in three days a week. One of these teachers comes in usually
around nine-thirty.” This is not acceptable. Excellent teachers are those who
aid in the growth of a student’s self-esteem, help encourage their students to
learn and to not give up, and have an excellent grasp of content knowledge. A
good teacher can find a correlation with the student and the material being studied
to make it real. A bad teacher is one who cannot connect with a student or is
unmotivated to sculpt the curriculum to the student’s needs in his/her
classroom. The effects of a bad teacher are very detrimental. The effect a bad
teacher has on a child promotes a lack of motivation, the classroom most likely
reflects a negative environment. The student’s achievements will most
definitely decrease. This will greatly affect the student, and any learned
information will be lost which will impact the subsequent educational years if
it’s not corrected.
An obvious illustration of the
inequities of the educational system is evidenced by the facilities where the
children attend school. In East St. Louis the children where sandwiched between
Pfizer and Monsanto. The soil surrounding the school is contaminated with lead
and human waste. The environment in which these children are placed is extremely
toxic and detrimental to their health, and imposes serious threats to their
safety. This environment is not conducive to learning. This is a highly toxic
industrial waste dumping ground for this school. The children cannot play on the playground. Attracting
teachers to this environment is very difficult, you do not receive high
performing teachers in a heavy industrial and highly toxic setting. Because of
the impact this has on attracting teachers, the resulting outcome is high class
sizes. High class size can have a negative effect on a student’s achievement. Students
benefit from lower class sizes. “Teachers who have fewer students are able to
provide each student with more individual attention. Fewer students means
teachers have more manageable workloads and more time to work one on one…” There are significant benefits to lower class size. There
was a study conducted on the effects of class size on students. “The study
concludes that…a small class increased the rate of college attendance by 11
percentage points.” Schools in wealthier areas do not experience the
same facility issues that exist in the East St. Louis district. These students
in the affluent areas are not handicapped by their environment and experience a
much better outcome. This is appalling that conditions like this continue to exist
in the United States. We are not a third world country.
Student materials are necessary for success.
Not all materials are important, however fundamental ones are. A school
district that does not receive proper funding needs to look at the needs of the
student population and prioritize. For instance, desks are not really
necessary, but books, paper, pencils, and teacher manuals are. It’s all about
resources and per pupil funding. If the money is not available you have to
weigh the needs and the wants. More affluent areas depend heavily on parent
supplementation for funding. In my school district, parents were expected to
contribute a substantial amount (called a recommended donation) to cover
various costs/programs. This money went into a ‘Learning Fund’. A percentage of
this money was allocated to the teachers depending on grade level needs to use
for supplies. If the money is not available, or parent assistance is not
possible, then many of these ‘needs’ are scratched which is a huge disservice
to each child. It then may become the classroom teacher’s responsibility. Most
classroom teachers spend a substantial out-of-pocket expense trying to assist
the needs of each and every child. There is no getting around it. Basic school
supplies are needed to facilitate a learning environment. “A teacher at an
elementary school in East St. Louis has only one full-color workbook for her
class. She photocopies workbook pages for her children, but the copies can’t be
made in color and the lessons call for color recognition by the children.”
Unfortunately, the poorer school districts lack even the basics.
Society
in general has not recognized the severe inequities in the educational system. In
the book, Pedagogy of the Oppressed,
Paulo Freire spends a great deal of time studying the teacher/student
relationship. I find the Pedagogy of the
Oppressed to be insulting when it comes to the poorer school districts in
this country. “A careful analysis of the teacher-student relationship…involves
a narrating Subject (the teacher) and patient listening objects (the students).”
The basic premise of the Pedagogy of the
Oppressed is that students are being oppressed by the teacher/student
relationship. Really? In the East St. Louis schools you cannot even get
teachers let alone worry about the teacher/student relationship oppressing students.
I find the Pedagogy of the Oppressed
to be very esoteric and not germane to an impoverished school system. “Education
is suffering from narration sickness.” I am sure the students of East St. Louis
and other impoverished districts would not mind suffering from “narration
sickness.”
As
expressed in the movie Waiting for
Superman, the society in which you are placed will determine your
educational experience and outcome. If you are placed in an underprivileged
area, you are going to get a poor quality education. Our educational system is discouraging
our students instead of propelling them forward. This is a very complex issue
with a lot of moving parts between the federal, state, local city governments,
teachers union and parents. “No individual is necessarily to blame, but
collectively they are the goliath of the system.” The educational system is
flawed. We have put into place educational acts and doubled the money per
student thinking it will help. But there is no improvement. “The things we’ve
done to help our schools work better, have become the things that prevent them
from working.” The flaw is not just with funding, it is with the system. There is
no clear answer.
Our educational system is in desperate need of reform. I
get so frustrated when I hear ‘education reform.’ They have been doing
education reform for so many years with no positive outcome and we still have a
myriad of inequities in our school system, i.e. East St. Louis. The question is
this, how can we provide an equitable education for all students? I do not have
the answer. However, I will do what I can to foster change and will support
measures to improve the quality of education for all students.
Works
Cited
Kozol, Jonathan. Savage Inequalities. New York: Crown
Publishing, 1991. Print
Paulo Freire. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York:
Continuum Books, 1993
Brozak, Jennifer. "The Importance of a Low Student to Teacher
Ratio." Everyday Life.
Demand Media. 28 Feb. 2014
<http://everydaylife.globalpost.com/importance-low-student-teacher-ratio-8579.html>.
Dynarski, Susan, Joshua Hyman, and Diane W. Schanzenbach.
"Experimental Evidence on the Effect of
Childhood Investments on Postsecondary Attainment and Degree Completion." Class
Size Matters. 16 Oct. 2011. 26
Feb. 2014 <http://www.classsizematters.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/dynarski-120426.pdf>.
Guggenheim, Davis, dir. Waiting for ‘Superman’. Walden Media, 2010. DVD.
Sunday, February 23, 2014
Waiting for Superman
Waiting for Superman shed light on
the injustices of our society and the flaws in our educational system. The movie really goes to show everything that
I have been saying in my blogs. Our educational system is discouraging our
students instead of propelling them forward. This is a very complex issue with
a lot of moving parts, between the federal, state, local city governments,
teachers union and parents. “No
individual is necessarily to blame, but collectively they are the goliath of
the system.” (Jonathan Alter, Waiting for Superman) The educational system is
flawed, we put into place educational acts and doubled the money per student
thinking it will help. But there is no improvement. “The things we’ve done to help our schools
work better, have become the things that prevent them from working.” (Narrator
of movie) The flaw is not just with funding, it is with the system. There is no
clear answer.
The movie
discussed multiple issues. One topic in particular was teacher tenure as a road
block to success in the schools. Teacher tenure is certainly contributing to
the problem. I feel that teacher tenure
should be eliminated and they should have to work and be held to a disciplinary
standard of other working individuals. Teachers
need to feel the fear of being unemployed which would make anyone want to work
harder and not become complacent. Get rid of tenure to get rid of poor teachers
who have become “burnt out” or those teachers who are just not cut out for
teaching. There was an attempt made to eliminate
teacher tenure in the Washington D.C schools by the superintendent. That superintendent, Michelle Rhee was
brilliant. She recognized the problem and set forth with a passion to fix it
but was shut down by the, lazy, and scared individuals heading up the teachers
union. “There is a complete and utter lack of accountability for the job that
we’re supposed to be doing, which is producing results for kids.” (Michelle
Rhee, Waiting for Superman)
I’m in complete agreement with this
movie. One of the former superintendents of Washington D.C., Lt. General Julius
Becton, is quoted for saying that he has “never faced a more difficult task
then reforming the schools of Washington.” This goes to illustrate how dysfunction
the politics are in the educational system. Lt. General Becton was awarded two
purple hearts and a silver star, I think he would have an understanding on what
is difficult. He resigned sixteen months later.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)